PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.94%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
30.96%
Gross profit growth of 30.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
37.75%
EBIT growth of 37.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
37.75%
Operating income growth of 37.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
37.74%
Net income growth of 37.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 33.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
27.59%
Share change of 27.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
6.33%
Diluted share change of 6.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.52%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-32.08%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.15%
AR growth of 19.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
221.37%
Inventory growth of 221.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
28.36%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-0.76%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-63.33%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
24.19%
R&D growth of 24.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
33.33%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.