PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.64%
Revenue growth of 15.64% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
13.58%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
22.90%
EBIT growth of 22.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
22.90%
Operating income growth of 22.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
25.25%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
50.00%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-15.63%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
3.57%
Diluted share change of 3.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.49%
OCF growth of 100.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-11.81%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
93.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR near Technology median of 93.76%. Charlie Munger might expect stable industry trends guiding long-term growth.
93.17%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 35.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
93.17%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
188.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 188.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
188.68%
OCF/share CAGR of 188.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
188.68%
3Y OCF/share growth of 188.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
168.12%
Net income/share CAGR of 168.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
168.12%
Net income/share CAGR of 168.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
168.12%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 168.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
95.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 95.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
95.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 95.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
95.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
AR growth of 7.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
46.92%
Inventory growth of 46.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
121.35%
Asset growth of 121.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
54.53%
BV/share growth of 54.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-24.33%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
15.78%
R&D growth of 15.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.31%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.