PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.76%
Revenue growth of 14.76% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
14.50%
Gross profit growth of 14.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
13.53%
EBIT growth of 13.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
13.53%
Operating income growth of 13.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
23.16%
Net income growth of 23.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-41.67%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-40.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
103.97%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
104.39%
Diluted share change of 104.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.49%
OCF growth of 126.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
418.36%
FCF growth of 418.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-5.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 48.48%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-5.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.39%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-5.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.85%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
414.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 414.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
414.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 414.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
414.93%
3Y OCF/share growth of 414.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
45.15%
Net income/share CAGR of 45.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
45.15%
Net income/share CAGR of 45.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
45.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 45.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
7.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 7.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
7.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 7.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
7.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.19%
AR growth of 18.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
23.34%
Inventory growth of 23.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
13.26%
Asset growth of 13.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-37.80%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-28.87%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
12.96%
R&D growth of 12.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
20.55%
SG&A growth of 20.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.