PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.30%
Revenue growth of 16.30% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
16.08%
Gross profit growth of 16.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
26.27%
EBIT growth of 26.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
26.27%
Operating income growth of 26.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
24.62%
Net income growth of 24.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
157.14%
EPS growth of 157.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 150.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-48.95%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.12%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-49.43%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.53%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-32.27%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
82.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 51.96%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
82.27%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
82.27%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
50.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 50.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
50.24%
OCF/share CAGR of 50.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
50.24%
3Y OCF/share growth of 50.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
136.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 136.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
136.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
136.25%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
227.76%
Equity/share CAGR of 227.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
227.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 227.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
227.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.63%
AR growth of 22.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
36.78%
Inventory growth of 36.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
93.88%
Asset growth of 93.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
243.60%
BV/share growth of 243.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
16866.72%
Debt growth of 16866.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
9.34%
R&D growth of 9.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
1.71%
SG&A growth of 1.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.