PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.70%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.25%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-52.07%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.93%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-94.74%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-94.74%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.09%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-93.69%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-93.48%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-92.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.07%
Share change of 1.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-7.56%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.63%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-198.48%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
301.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.42%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
301.46%
5Y CAGR of 301.46% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
301.46%
3Y CAGR of 301.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
114.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 114.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
114.83%
OCF/share CAGR of 114.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
114.83%
3Y OCF/share growth of 114.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-42.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-42.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-42.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -8.90%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
684.85%
Equity/share CAGR of 684.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
684.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 684.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
684.85%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 684.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.14%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
12.37%
Inventory growth of 12.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.96%
Asset growth of 0.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.64%
BV/share growth of 0.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.51%
Debt growth of 1.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
9.02%
R&D growth of 9.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-4.20%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.