PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.71%
Revenue growth of 0.71% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
8.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-912.75%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.35%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-912.75%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.25%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-1025.69%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-966.67%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-966.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.68%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-9.15%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13562.28%
OCF growth of 13562.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
420.66%
FCF growth of 420.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
240.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
240.58%
5Y CAGR of 240.58% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
240.58%
3Y CAGR of 240.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
567.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 567.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
567.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 567.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
567.31%
3Y OCF/share growth of 567.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-452.26%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-452.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-452.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is -7.19%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
586.03%
Equity/share CAGR of 586.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
586.03%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 586.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
586.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 586.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.65%
AR growth of 12.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-28.14%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.90%
Asset growth of 0.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.15%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.51%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
0.96%
R&D growth of 0.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
7.76%
SG&A growth of 7.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.