PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.64%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-21.56%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-62.75%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-62.75%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-61.23%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-60.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-5.32%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.48%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-87.03%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
320.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 33.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
320.91%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
117.89%
3Y CAGR of 117.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
777.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 777.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
777.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 777.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
203.94%
3Y OCF/share growth of 203.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
131.30%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
131.30%
Net income/share CAGR of 131.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
-13.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
824.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 824.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
824.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 824.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
372.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 372.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.81%
AR growth of 0.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
14.30%
Inventory growth of 14.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.36%
Asset growth of 4.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.80%
BV/share growth of 8.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.05%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.38%
R&D growth of 3.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-56.97%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.