176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.23%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
2.69%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Technology median of 4.20%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
-6.51%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-6.51%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 6.17%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
22.30%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
30.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.92%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
3.95%
Diluted share change of 3.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.46%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-419.88%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
310.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.25%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
310.99%
5Y CAGR of 310.99% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
335.67%
3Y CAGR of 335.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
497.51%
OCF/share CAGR of 497.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
497.51%
OCF/share CAGR of 497.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
26.22%
3Y OCF/share growth of 26.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
151.32%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.11% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
151.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.28%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
73.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 41.28%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
741.63%
Equity/share CAGR of 741.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
741.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 741.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
680.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 680.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.13%
AR growth of 22.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
31.41%
Inventory growth of 31.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.49%
Asset growth of 5.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.70%
BV/share growth of 2.70% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.11%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
10.64%
R&D growth of 10.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.90%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.