PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.87%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
3.04%
Gross profit growth of 3.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
55.04%
EBIT growth of 55.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
55.04%
Operating income growth of 55.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
280.21%
Net income growth of 280.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
333.33%
EPS growth of 333.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth of 333.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.68%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.98%
OCF growth of 88.98% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
58.42%
FCF growth of 58.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
241.96%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 25.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
241.96%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
116.71%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.56%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-116.65%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-116.65%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-106.12%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
53.94%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
53.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-22.07%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 67.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
684.61%
Equity/share CAGR of 684.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
684.61%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 684.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
159.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 159.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.58%
AR growth of 24.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-10.19%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-4.07%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
4.11%
BV/share growth of 4.11% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-42.16%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-1.45%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
0.43%
SG&A growth of 0.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.