PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.87%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-84.09%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-84.09%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-76.02%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-72.73%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-70.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.65%
Share change of 0.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.59%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.99%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-206.14%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
292.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
292.53%
5Y CAGR of 292.53% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
49.47%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-487.74%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-487.74%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-142.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-48.71%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 2.63%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-48.71%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-87.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 58.34%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
791.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 791.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
791.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 791.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
77.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 77.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.01%
AR growth of 20.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
13.71%
Inventory growth of 13.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.56%
Asset growth of 1.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.18%
BV/share growth of 0.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-39.85%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
9.86%
R&D growth of 9.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
7.77%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.