PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.07%
Revenue growth of 3.07% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
8.43%
Gross profit growth of 8.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
33.29%
EBIT growth of 33.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
33.29%
Operating income growth of 33.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
34.23%
Net income growth of 34.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
39.13%
EPS growth of 39.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.43%
Diluted EPS growth of 30.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-4.97%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
1.70%
Diluted share change of 1.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.67%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-6.30%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
470.73%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.23%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
195.45%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-10.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 26.26%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
1728.60%
OCF/share CAGR of 1728.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
533.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 533.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
64.10%
3Y OCF/share growth of 64.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
609.96%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 31.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
164.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-30.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 65.38%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1013.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 1013.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
469.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 469.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
26.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.46%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.40%
Asset growth of 0.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
9.90%
BV/share growth of 9.90% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
902.10%
Debt growth of 902.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
2.21%
R&D growth of 2.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-8.64%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.