PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.55%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
3.51%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 2.89%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
5.06%
EBIT growth of 5.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
5.06%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
16.13%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.00%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
15.63%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.60%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.18%
Share change of 0.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.19%
Diluted share change of 0.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.14%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-76.13%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
386.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.19%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
416.09%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
21.27%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 25.35%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
1047.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 1047.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
200.98%
OCF/share CAGR of 200.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
6289.46%
3Y OCF/share growth of 6289.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
637.92%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.51% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
408.37%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
1184.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 64.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
921.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 921.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
846.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 846.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
30.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 30.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.23%
AR growth of 39.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-2.21%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.70%
Asset growth of 5.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.45%
BV/share growth of 3.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-100.00%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.12%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.54%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.