PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.50%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
4.89%
Gross profit growth of 4.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-10.62%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.62%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-12.81%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-13.51%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-9.09%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.65%
Share change of 0.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.38%
Diluted share change of 1.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.62%
OCF growth of 77.62% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
288.91%
FCF growth of 288.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
316.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 36.54%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
128.44%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
22.26%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 27.75%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
454.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 454.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
269.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 269.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-16.91%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
326.17%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 57.61% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
80.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
220.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.06%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
849.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 849.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
189.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 189.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
38.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.03%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.35%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.47%
Asset growth of 4.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.14%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
R&D growth of 2.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.52%
SG&A growth of 5.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.