PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.84%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.70%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
1.17%
Gross profit growth near Technology median of 1.17%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry cost structures.
-4.84%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.84%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-4.33%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-2.33%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-2.63%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.66%
Share change of 0.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-1.22%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.26%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-110.46%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
461.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.78%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
113.91%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
36.69%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
428.36%
OCF/share CAGR of 428.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-76.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-17.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
725.23%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.91% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
109.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
228.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1178.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 1178.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
153.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 153.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
51.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 51.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
AR growth of 17.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
9.32%
Inventory growth of 9.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.04%
Asset growth of 1.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.18%
BV/share growth of 2.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.96%
R&D growth of 3.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.16%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.