PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.10%
Revenue growth of 7.10% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
15.50%
Gross profit growth of 15.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
17.77%
EBIT growth of 17.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
17.77%
Operating income growth of 17.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
53.51%
Net income growth of 53.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
36.00%
EPS growth of 36.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
51.11%
Diluted EPS growth of 51.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
8.15%
Share change of 8.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.06%
Diluted share change of 2.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.37%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-40.62%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
439.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
64.09%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
57.73%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
3325.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 3325.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
350.56%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
20671.08%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Technology median of 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
782.52%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.29% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
108.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
473.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1169.28%
Equity/share CAGR of 1169.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
144.32%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
61.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.08%
AR growth of 18.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-5.05%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.69%
Asset growth of 5.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.54%
BV/share growth of 0.54% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-100.00%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
15.31%
R&D growth of 15.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
12.33%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.