PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.94%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-1.44%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
1.97%
EBIT growth of 1.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
1.97%
Operating income growth of 1.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-19.11%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.76%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-19.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-5.34%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.03%
OCF growth of 33.03% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
73.79%
FCF growth of 73.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
671.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
20.97%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 26.49%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
63.79%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
5748.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 5748.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
424.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 424.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
356.35%
3Y OCF/share growth of 356.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1262.01%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.33% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
32.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might question fundamental disadvantages in cost structure or growth drivers.
467.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.54%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
1672.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 1672.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
101.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 101.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
76.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 76.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.09%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.22%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.70%
Asset growth of 4.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
10.33%
BV/share growth of 10.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.44%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-5.12%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.