PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-22.60%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 1.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-70.88%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.82%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-176.56%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 2.85%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-176.56%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 6.19%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-168.40%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 1.63%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-167.50%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-172.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.05%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.18%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.26%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
148.21%
FCF growth of 148.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
589.93%
10Y CAGR of 589.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
67.87%
5Y CAGR of 67.87% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
41.71%
3Y CAGR of 41.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
1578.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 1578.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
272.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 272.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
56.03%
3Y OCF/share growth of 56.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-1188.09%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-532.96%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-247.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1845.86%
Equity/share CAGR of 1845.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
131.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 131.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
90.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 90.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.24%
AR growth of 4.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
2.89%
Inventory growth of 2.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
4.01%
Asset growth of 4.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-2.67%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.71%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-0.68%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.