PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-46.40%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-61.49%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.80%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-408.27%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 1.23%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-408.27%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 5.54%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-339.14%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 1.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-346.43%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 3.03%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-342.86%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 3.03%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.13%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-3.67%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.15%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 8.33%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
4.83%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
214.06%
10Y CAGR of 214.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
-8.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-21.22%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-413.82%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-1784.49%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-109.14%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-947.67%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-650.66%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-256.25%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1510.75%
Equity/share CAGR of 1510.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
105.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 105.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
70.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 70.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.61%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
2.64%
Inventory growth of 2.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-8.17%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.61%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.27%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-4.33%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.