PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.05%
Revenue growth of 38.05% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
33.90%
Gross profit growth of 33.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-31.92%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-31.92%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-36.35%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-36.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.87%
Share change of 0.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
816.19%
OCF growth of 816.19% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
293.17%
FCF growth of 293.17% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
505.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
28.61%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-6.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 1.72%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
2606.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 2606.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
111.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 111.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
171.41%
3Y OCF/share growth of 171.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-2169.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 23.87%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-961.70%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 22.40%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-313.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.26%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1857.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 1857.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
95.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 95.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
38.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 38.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-39.15%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-5.13%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.00%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.10%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
42.51%
R&D growth of 42.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
37.51%
SG&A growth of 37.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.