PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.97%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
4.02%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
9.76%
EBIT growth of 9.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
9.76%
Operating income growth of 9.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
4.97%
Net income growth of 4.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
5.26%
EPS growth of 5.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1.75%
Diluted EPS growth of 1.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
1.63%
Share change of 1.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.89%
Diluted share change of 2.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-148.16%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
352.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
53.06%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
13.23%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-134.04%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-105.37%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-101.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
404.31%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 65.47% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
90.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 50.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-0.72%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 39.61%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1080.32%
Equity/share CAGR of 1080.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
107.36%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 107.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
30.25%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 30.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.26%
AR growth of 41.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
17.38%
Inventory growth of 17.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.05%
Asset growth of 6.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.61%
BV/share growth of 5.61% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.44%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
0.86%
R&D growth of 0.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.05%
SG&A growth of 3.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.