PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.03%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-70.57%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.73%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-218.87%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-218.87%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.35%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-202.45%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-203.33%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-206.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.98%
Share change of 0.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-3.09%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
736.35%
OCF growth of 736.35% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
85.32%
FCF growth of 85.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
544.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
24.88%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-17.12%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.90%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
93.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 93.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-35.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-90.09%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-947.31%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 43.22%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-266.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.42%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-177.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 19.75%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1713.37%
Equity/share CAGR of 1713.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
91.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 91.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
16.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 16.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.25%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
11.87%
Inventory growth of 11.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.89%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.44%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-1.51%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-3.42%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
8.79%
SG&A growth of 8.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.