PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.03%
Revenue growth of 4.03% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
191.95%
Gross profit growth of 191.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
159.23%
EBIT growth of 159.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
159.23%
Operating income growth of 159.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
160.20%
Net income growth of 160.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
161.29%
EPS growth of 161.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
161.29%
Diluted EPS growth of 161.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.80%
Share change of 0.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.73%
Diluted share change of 1.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
517.80%
OCF growth of 517.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
5868.30%
FCF growth of 5868.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
191.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
27.81%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-27.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 5.95%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
722.75%
OCF/share CAGR of 722.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
122.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 122.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-46.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
107.29%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
14.91%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
-65.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 43.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
449.65%
Equity/share CAGR of 449.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
89.75%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 89.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
12.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 12.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
AR growth of 0.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-12.99%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.94%
Asset growth of 4.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.15%
BV/share growth of 4.15% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.58%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-2.90%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-15.29%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.