PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.54%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
13.64%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-13.86%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-13.86%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -0.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-21.22%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -2.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-18.31%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-22.54%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -0.09%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.95%
Share change of 1.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.97%
Diluted share change of 1.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.38%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-65.89%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
179.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
23.81%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-22.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 15.14%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
237.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 237.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
199.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 199.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
10.76%
3Y OCF/share growth of 10.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
265.36%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 71.76% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
30.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median. John Neff would encourage better profitability or share buybacks to catch up with peers.
-28.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 57.31%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
420.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 420.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
88.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 88.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
17.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 17.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.60%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
10.26%
Inventory growth of 10.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.37%
Asset growth of 5.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
6.30%
BV/share growth of 6.30% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.85%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.40%
R&D growth of 7.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-32.34%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.