PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.66%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.23%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
8.42%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
12.38%
EBIT growth of 12.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
12.38%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
12.09%
Net income growth of 12.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
8.62%
EPS growth of 8.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
14.55%
Diluted EPS growth of 14.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
1.10%
Share change of 1.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.07%
Diluted share change of 0.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.37%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-58.37%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
176.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
29.17%
5Y CAGR of 29.17% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
5.18%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 8.12%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
-0.16%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
321.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 321.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-6.42%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
219.36%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.01% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
52.64%
Net income/share CAGR of 52.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
215.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 33.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
394.74%
Equity/share CAGR of 394.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
94.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 94.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
27.97%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 27.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.36%
AR growth of 22.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-5.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.73%
Asset growth of 3.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
5.85%
BV/share growth of 5.85% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.02%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.00%
R&D growth of 7.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.52%
SG&A growth of 5.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.