PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.89%
Revenue growth of 4.89% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
5.98%
Gross profit growth of 5.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
13.25%
EBIT growth of 13.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
13.25%
Operating income growth of 13.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
17.62%
Net income growth of 17.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
15.87%
EPS growth of 15.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
15.87%
Diluted EPS growth of 15.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.95%
Share change of 0.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.06%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.99%
OCF growth of 197.99% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
249.90%
FCF growth of 249.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
104.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
13.16%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
6.40%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Technology median of 10.20%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
793.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 793.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-26.42%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
409.15%
3Y OCF/share growth of 409.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
183.95%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 76.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
45.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 26.18%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
158.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 32.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
362.88%
Equity/share CAGR of 362.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
87.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 87.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
43.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 43.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.59%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-11.69%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.57%
Asset growth of 3.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
6.68%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.42%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.54%
R&D growth of 3.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.39%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.