PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.60%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-11.98%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-37.94%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-37.94%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-34.92%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-34.25%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-34.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.72%
Share change of 0.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.82%
Diluted share change of 0.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.96%
OCF growth of 67.96% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
77.88%
FCF growth of 77.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
66.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
1.43%
5Y CAGR of 1.43% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
74.20%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
650.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 650.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
66.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 66.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
1918.95%
3Y OCF/share growth of 1918.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
38.55%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
-33.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
169.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 169.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
371.99%
Equity/share CAGR of 371.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
93.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 93.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
52.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.48%
Inventory growth of 6.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
9.12%
Asset growth of 9.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.59%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.32%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
4.04%
R&D growth of 4.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-2.23%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.