PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.97%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.21%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.44%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -2.39%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-40.46%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -4.56%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-40.46%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -6.46%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-47.91%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -7.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-47.92%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -5.22%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-47.92%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -5.26%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.71%
Share change of 0.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.84%
Diluted share change of 0.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.24%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-110.44%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
16.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.10%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-3.71%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.53%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
22.63%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-113.86%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-102.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-105.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-46.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 37.32%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-59.84%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.03%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
126.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 126.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
262.34%
Equity/share CAGR of 262.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
79.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 79.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
62.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.32%
AR growth of 22.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.71%
Inventory growth of 0.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.80%
Asset growth of 2.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
2.69%
BV/share growth of 2.69% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.84%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
6.39%
R&D growth of 6.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.75%
SG&A growth of 5.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.