PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.91%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.84%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
16.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
91.72%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.25%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
91.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
96.98%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.97%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
92.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
92.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.60%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.52%
Share change of 0.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2281.65%
OCF growth of 2281.65% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
464.38%
FCF growth of 464.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
80.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.39%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-1.28%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
18.76%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
22097.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 22097.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-46.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
31.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 31.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1572.42%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.62% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-39.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
199.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 199.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
272.06%
Equity/share CAGR of 272.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
74.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 74.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
75.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.31%
AR growth of 8.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
12.98%
Inventory growth of 12.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
3.22%
Asset growth of 3.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.34%
BV/share growth of 3.34% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.85%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.95%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
12.44%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.