PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.07%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-8.02%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.68%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-27.22%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-27.22%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-16.79%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-17.65%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-15.66%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.35%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.09%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
148.51%
OCF growth of 148.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
194.77%
FCF growth of 194.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
91.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.86%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-17.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 11.18%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
1.38%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 4.57%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
193.99%
OCF/share CAGR of 193.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
59.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 59.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
486.12%
3Y OCF/share growth of 486.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
176.80%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.87% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-39.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 31.47%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
19.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 19.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
319.49%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.48% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
65.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
63.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.09%
AR growth of 2.09% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-2.17%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.55%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.58%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-3.20%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
4.87%
R&D growth of 4.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.75%
SG&A growth of 3.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.