PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.62%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -2.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.43%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -1.64%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-7.22%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-7.22%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -5.20%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-7.08%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-7.69%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.65%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.20%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.68%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-62.31%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-63.52%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
107.11%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.42%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
61.04%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
21.95%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.69%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
117.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
3.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 3.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-6.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
466.73%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 39.90% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
165.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
7.41%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
240.03%
Equity/share CAGR of 240.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
74.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
28.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.02%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
1.42%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-5.33%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-4.92%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.44%
Debt growth of 0.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-0.71%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
2.51%
SG&A growth of 2.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.