PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 1.99%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
2.44%
Gross profit growth near Technology median of 2.54%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry cost structures.
7.81%
EBIT growth of 7.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
7.81%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-6.26%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3.33%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.16%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.03%
Diluted share change of 0.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
1.66%
Dividend growth of 1.66% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-36.25%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-39.52%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
116.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.36%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
39.07%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
16.87%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.63%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
397.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 397.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-30.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
26.45%
3Y OCF/share growth of 26.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2133.69%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.88% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
219.01%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-9.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 12.84%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
251.20%
Equity/share CAGR of 251.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
87.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
25.69%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.46%
AR growth of 18.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-1.49%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.01%
Asset growth of 1.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.47%
BV/share growth of 3.47% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.44%
Debt growth of 0.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.86%
R&D growth of 0.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
0.08%
SG&A growth of 0.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.