PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.11%
Revenue growth of 11.11% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
9.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
30.72%
EBIT growth of 30.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
30.72%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
35.16%
Net income growth of 35.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
37.93%
EPS growth of 37.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
41.82%
Diluted EPS growth of 41.82% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.87%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.17%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.02%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
123.95%
OCF growth of 123.95% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
138.47%
FCF growth of 138.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
116.11%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
36.54%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
27.37%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
45077.62%
OCF/share CAGR of 45077.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
53.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 53.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-2.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
507.76%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 50.33% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
61.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
7.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier might worry about a partial underperformance vs. competitor norms.
244.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 244.94% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
74.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
17.27%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.97%
AR growth of 19.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
5.33%
Inventory growth of 5.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.69%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.47%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.44%
Debt growth of 0.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.88%
R&D growth of 0.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.90%
SG&A growth of 3.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.