PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.96%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -3.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.66%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -3.11%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-23.85%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -7.38%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-23.85%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -10.28%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-30.62%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -11.82%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-31.82%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -10.49%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-31.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -10.48%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.89%
Share change of 0.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.05%
Diluted share change of 2.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-1.35%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-44.44%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-47.53%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
81.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.81%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
18.70%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 12.95%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
39.59%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
153.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 153.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
4809.05%
OCF/share CAGR of 4809.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
3096.56%
3Y OCF/share growth of 3096.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
91.62%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.66% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
0.61%
Net income/share CAGR of 0.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
148.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
241.19%
Equity/share CAGR of 241.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
64.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
19.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.01%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-9.30%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
1.24%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
2.22%
Positive BV/share change while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
0.40%
Debt growth of 0.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-2.66%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
14.80%
SG&A growth of 14.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.