PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.17%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 3.32%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-2.91%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.74%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-56.82%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 3.96%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-56.82%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 6.21%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-80.60%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 7.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-78.33%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 7.51%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-78.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 7.92%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.46%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.11%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
16.92%
Dividend growth of 16.92% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-33.74%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-35.65%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
87.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.45%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
50.48%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
26.33%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
222.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 222.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
402.48%
OCF/share CAGR of 402.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-7.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-67.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 5.40%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
119.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-75.01%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 13.88%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
207.45%
Equity/share CAGR of 207.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
60.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 60.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
7.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.97%
AR growth of 12.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
0.68%
Inventory growth of 0.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.28%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.78%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.50%
Debt growth of 0.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-5.60%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
7.97%
SG&A growth of 7.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.