PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
7.77%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
2.86%
EBIT growth of 2.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
2.86%
Operating income growth of 2.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
-15.85%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-13.64%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.55%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
4.96%
Diluted share change of 4.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
15.73%
Dividend growth of 15.73% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
100.39%
OCF growth of 100.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
108.40%
FCF growth of 108.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
128.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
71.09%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
45.63%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.00%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
134.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 134.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
27.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 27.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
30.36%
3Y OCF/share growth of 30.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
118.48%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.51% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
30.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
36.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
217.26%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.86% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
6.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-5.78%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.65%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.73%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
0.65%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
6.56%
Debt growth of 6.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.56%
R&D growth of 4.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.92%
SG&A growth of 5.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.