PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -1.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.06%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -1.86%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-2.78%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -4.89%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.78%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -6.99%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-5.31%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -5.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is -4.76%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-5.68%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is -4.95%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.37%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
0.67%
Diluted share change of 0.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
2.02%
Dividend growth of 2.02% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-39.53%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-48.79%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
86.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.83%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
50.25%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
57.02%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
495.91%
OCF/share CAGR of 495.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
98.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 98.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
102.08%
3Y OCF/share growth of 102.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
110.08%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
60.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
189.06%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
153.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 153.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
34.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 15.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-0.08%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 11.39%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.94%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 53.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
3.56%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
-5.74%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.55%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-5.76%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.07%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
0.58%
R&D growth of 0.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.24%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.