PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.86%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is -1.78%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-11.74%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -1.38%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-24.42%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -2.47%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-24.42%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -5.63%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-22.60%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-26.67%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
7.05%
Share change of 7.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-2.88%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.79%
Dividend growth of 0.79% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-60.89%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-65.97%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
109.76%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.73%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
117.85%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
65.88%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-15.88%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
3285.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 3285.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
76.35%
3Y OCF/share growth of 76.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
250.47%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 45.19% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
772.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
250.74%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
167.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 167.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
48.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 22.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
38.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 11.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.72%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.72% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
18.16%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
3.40%
Inventory growth of 3.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.38%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.59%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-21.52%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
4.31%
R&D growth of 4.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.11%
SG&A growth of 5.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.