PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
25.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.28%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
13.52%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.26%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-33.30%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-33.30%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.22%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-32.17%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.33%
Share change of 0.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.64%
Diluted share change of 0.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
0.69%
Dividend growth of 0.69% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
72.39%
OCF growth of 72.39% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
79.05%
FCF growth of 79.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
343.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.95%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
194.48%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
68.02%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
4142.41%
OCF/share CAGR of 4142.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
744.30%
OCF/share CAGR of 744.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
115.41%
3Y OCF/share growth of 115.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
510.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.40% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
2001.04%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 32.53%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
3.40%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
368.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 368.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
191.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
125.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.05%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.05% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
14.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 14.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
9.28%
AR growth of 9.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
24.20%
Inventory growth of 24.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
8.28%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
5.88%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
1.54%
Debt growth of 1.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
35.65%
R&D growth of 35.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
113.99%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.