PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.15%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
14.95%
Gross profit growth of 14.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
29.79%
EBIT growth of 29.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
29.79%
Operating income growth of 29.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
31.23%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
30.51%
EPS growth of 30.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
31.03%
Diluted EPS growth of 31.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.32%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.16%
Diluted share change of 0.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.32%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-9.34%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-11.66%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
463.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.61%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
275.12%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 26.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
72.26%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.97%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
942.36%
OCF/share CAGR of 942.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
424.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 424.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
26.56%
3Y OCF/share growth of 26.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1254.35%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 57.32% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
743.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 39.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
49.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 28.89%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
421.55%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 59.04% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
286.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 39.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
137.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 38.08% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
6.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 6.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
24.50%
AR growth of 24.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
9.09%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
6.96%
Asset growth of 6.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
10.78%
BV/share growth of 10.78% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.86%
Debt growth of 1.86% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.52%
R&D growth of 0.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.38%
SG&A growth of 3.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.