PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.16%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.53%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
9.87%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
9.29%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
9.29%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
3.79%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
4.21%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.80%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
3.19%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.24%
Share change of 0.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.24%
Diluted share change of 0.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-0.24%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-43.36%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-48.06%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
547.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.56%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
205.23%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
117.67%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.73%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
503.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 503.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
185.61%
OCF/share CAGR of 185.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
204.05%
3Y OCF/share growth of 204.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1243.02%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.52% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
291.49%
Net income/share CAGR of 291.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
95.27%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 95.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
481.97%
Equity/share CAGR of 481.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
284.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
144.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.17% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
7.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 7.12% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
10.26%
AR growth of 10.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
5.63%
Inventory growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
5.13%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
12.27%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-7.68%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
12.69%
R&D growth of 12.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.89%
SG&A growth of 5.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.