PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.44%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
8.64%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-37.10%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-37.10%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -2.61%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-46.12%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -1.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-45.83%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-46.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-0.31%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.08%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-42.93%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is -5.81%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-50.36%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is -4.20%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
780.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.22%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
304.32%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
261.71%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
18577.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 18577.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
480.03%
OCF/share CAGR of 480.03% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
132.93%
3Y OCF/share growth of 132.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
2531.36%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.60% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
201.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
297.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
503.38%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 38.23% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
305.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
162.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 18.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.24%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 15.24% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-0.12%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
16.95%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
21.42%
Inventory growth of 21.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.32%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
-1.18%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
0.10%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
10.37%
R&D growth of 10.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.15%
SG&A growth of 5.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.