PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.11%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.09%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-46.33%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.71%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-73.29%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-73.29%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-59.46%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-59.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.44%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.44%
Dividend growth of 0.44% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-26.63%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-38.91%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
537.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
187.74%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
153.80%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.37%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
527.38%
OCF/share CAGR of 527.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
72.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 72.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
32.48%
3Y OCF/share growth of 32.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
446.85%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.54% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
7.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
16.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
431.45%
Equity/share CAGR of 431.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
282.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
125.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.94%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.94% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-0.37%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-2.23%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
22.95%
Inventory growth of 22.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.84%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-8.98%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.06%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
12.73%
R&D growth of 12.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.