PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.53%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
8.99%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
20.44%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
20.44%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
3.66%
Net income growth 75-90% of Technology median of 4.39%. John Neff would expect management to seek margin or sales improvements.
3.85%
EPS growth 75-90% of Technology median of 4.44%. John Neff would want to see margin or revenue improvements to close the gap.
3.85%
Diluted EPS growth 75-90% of Technology median of 4.99%. John Neff would press for more efficient cost or share repurchases.
-0.48%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.48%
Dividend growth of 0.48% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-69.13%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 2.08%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-116.49%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 3.19%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
393.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.04%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
118.57%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
93.37%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.62%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
116.55%
OCF/share CAGR of 116.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-67.09%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-76.51%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
226.07%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.41% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-21.17%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 7.10%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-25.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.17%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
353.20%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 7.34% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
226.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
87.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.64%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 15.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
1.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.31% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-7.69%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
14.53%
Inventory growth of 14.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-6.87%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-10.06%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-6.35%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
6.63%
R&D growth of 6.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
6.59%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.