PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
87.81%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
103.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
217.76%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
217.76%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
202.89%
Net income growth of 202.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
201.20%
EPS growth of 201.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
204.88%
Diluted EPS growth of 204.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.12%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.36%
Diluted share change of 0.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
0.89%
Dividend growth of 0.89% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
118.07%
OCF growth of 118.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
127.53%
FCF growth of 127.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1208.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
324.63%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
248.11%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
6130.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 6130.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
582.64%
OCF/share CAGR of 582.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
303.63%
3Y OCF/share growth of 303.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
5974.42%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.03% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
451.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
891.23%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.80%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
524.07%
Equity/share CAGR of 524.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
207.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
96.93%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
118.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 118.44% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
7.89%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 7.89% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
0.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 0.64% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
73.19%
AR growth of 73.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-6.33%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
11.46%
Asset growth of 11.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
12.02%
BV/share growth of 12.02% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-9.32%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
8.80%
R&D growth of 8.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.74%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.