PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.98%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
25.31%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
30.69%
EBIT growth of 30.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
30.69%
Operating income growth of 30.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
32.91%
Net income growth of 32.91% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
31.58%
EPS growth of 31.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
32.43%
Diluted EPS growth of 32.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.08%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
2.14%
Dividend growth of 2.14% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
56.83%
OCF growth of 56.83% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
59.41%
FCF growth of 59.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
1681.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.38%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
890.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
343.59%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
2546.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 2546.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
1164.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 1164.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
458.57%
3Y OCF/share growth of 458.57% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
7610.59%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 47.62% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
2040.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 44.51%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
746.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.34%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
789.30%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 42.97% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
354.45%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 27.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
155.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
88.89%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.89% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-0.21%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
0.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 0.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
20.34%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
10.53%
Inventory growth of 10.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
21.39%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
29.30%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
0.26%
Debt growth of 0.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
7.45%
R&D growth of 7.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.34%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.