PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.83%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
21.53%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
24.20%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
24.20%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
21.13%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
22.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.16%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.01%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.04%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.85%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
33.45%
OCF growth of 33.45% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
33.18%
FCF growth of 33.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
2045.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 46.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
1056.95%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 33.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
364.17%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
9129.58%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.07% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
2001.82%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
726.15%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Technology median of 11.38%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
9801.56%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 76.05% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
3624.74%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 65.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
685.25%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 24.61%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
971.24%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 61.43% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
399.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 38.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
164.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
90.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-0.36%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-0.13%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
23.66%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
11.02%
Inventory growth of 11.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
17.26%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
14.53%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.59%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
10.34%
R&D growth of 10.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
9.13%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.