176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.31
D/E of 0.31 while MRVL has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
3.10
Net debt while MRVL maintains net cash position. John Neff would demand higher returns to justify the additional leverage risk.
20.42
Coverage of 20.42 while MRVL has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
6.82
Current ratio exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.31. Charlie Munger would verify if this advantage translates to better supplier terms.
11.01%
Intangibles less than half of MRVL's 38.23%. Mohnish Pabrai would verify if this conservative approach sacrifices brand value opportunities.
