PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.71%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 47.81%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.79%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 47.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.96%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AMD's 48.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.19%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x AMD's 0.44%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.96%
R&D growth less than half of AMD's 2.63%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1574.30%
Other expenses change of 1574.30% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
69.97%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.24%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.08%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 29.04%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.91%
D&A growth less than half of AMD's 33.46%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-650.53%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 174.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.88%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AMD's 85.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-912.75%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 75.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-907.05%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 83.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.70%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-748.05%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 59.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-743.50%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 72.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-165.30%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1025.69%
Net income decline while AMD shows 77.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1019.20%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 84.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-966.67%
EPS decline while AMD shows 77.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-966.67%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 77.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.68%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.29%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-9.15%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.29% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.