PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 2.05%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
18.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.85%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.69%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 2.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-9.55%
Margin decline while AMD shows 0.33% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.64%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.11%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.89%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.51%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 499.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.89%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 487.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.51%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 18.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 15.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.97%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.33%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 50.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.30%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.72%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.92%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.66%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.95%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.50%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.