PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.50%
Revenue growth below 50% of AMD's 9.15%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.57%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 22.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.89%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.34%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.47%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.92%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.46%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 8.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.02%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.08%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 106.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.23%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AMD's 88.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.62%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 16.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.94%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 6.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.76%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.88%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.29%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.81%
Net income decline while AMD shows 53.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.09%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 40.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.51%
EPS decline while AMD shows 55.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 50.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.65%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.30%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.38%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.